↓ Skip to main content

Detection of the arcuate fasciculus in congenital amusia depends on the tractography algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of the arcuate fasciculus in congenital amusia depends on the tractography algorithm
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joyce L. Chen, Sukhbinder Kumar, Victoria J. Williamson, Jan Scholz, Timothy D. Griffiths, Lauren Stewart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 33%
Neuroscience 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,374,110
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,425
of 31,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,745
of 355,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#241
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.