↓ Skip to main content

Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00421-014-3072-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Chambon, Nicolas Delattre, Nils Guéguen, Eric Berton, Guillaume Rao

Abstract

Minimalist running shoes are designed to induce a foot strike made more with the forepart of the foot. The main changes made on minimalist shoe consist in decreasing the height difference between fore and rear parts of the sole (drop). Barefoot and shod running have been widely compared on overground or treadmill these last years, but the key characteristic effects of minimalist shoes have been yet little studied. The purpose of this study is to find whether the shoe drop has the same effect regardless of the task: overground or treadmill running.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 211 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 22%
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 42 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 74 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Engineering 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 62 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,760,973
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#564
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,413
of 368,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#10
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.