Title |
Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-3072-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicolas Chambon, Nicolas Delattre, Nils Guéguen, Eric Berton, Guillaume Rao |
Abstract |
Minimalist running shoes are designed to induce a foot strike made more with the forepart of the foot. The main changes made on minimalist shoe consist in decreasing the height difference between fore and rear parts of the sole (drop). Barefoot and shod running have been widely compared on overground or treadmill these last years, but the key characteristic effects of minimalist shoes have been yet little studied. The purpose of this study is to find whether the shoe drop has the same effect regardless of the task: overground or treadmill running. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 5 | 16% |
United States | 4 | 13% |
Spain | 3 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
Scientists | 9 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 211 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 48 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 15% |
Researcher | 26 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
Other | 35 | 16% |
Unknown | 42 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 74 | 34% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
Engineering | 15 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 5% |
Unknown | 62 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,760,973
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#564
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,413
of 368,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#10
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.