| Title |
Faecal marking behaviour in ringtails (Bassariscus astutus) during the non-breeding period: spatial characteristics of latrines and single faeces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemoecology, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00049-006-0352-x |
| Authors |
Isabel Barja, Rurik List |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Czechia | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 145 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 39 | 24% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 21 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,894,369
of 23,577,547 outputs
Outputs from Chemoecology
#34
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,831
of 158,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemoecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them