| Title |
Nurse-Led Behavioral Management of Diabetes and Hypertension in Community Practices: A Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-3154-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Edelman, Rowena J. Dolor, Cynthia J. Coffman, Katherine C. Pereira, Bradi B. Granger, Jennifer H. Lindquist, Alice M. Neary, Amy J. Harris, Hayden B. Bosworth |
| Abstract |
Several trials have demonstrated the efficacy of nurse telephone case management for diabetes (DM) and hypertension (HTN) in academic or vertically integrated systems. Little is known about the real-world potency of these interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 14% |
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 79 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,342,975
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,797
of 8,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,127
of 360,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#48
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.