↓ Skip to main content

Alanine Scan of α-Conotoxin RegIIA Reveals a Selective α3β4 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonist*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alanine Scan of α-Conotoxin RegIIA Reveals a Selective α3β4 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonist*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, November 2014
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m114.605592
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiva N Kompella, Andrew Hung, Richard J Clark, Frank Marí, David J Adams

Abstract

Activation of the α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtype has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of various conditions, including development and progression of lung cancer and in nicotine addiction. As selective α3β4 nAChR antagonists, α-conotoxins are valuable tools to evaluate the functional roles of this receptor subtype. We previously reported the discovery of a new α4/7-conotoxin, RegIIA. RegIIA was isolated from Conus regius and inhibits acetylcholine (ACh)-evoked currents mediated by α3β4, α3β2 and α7 nAChR subtypes. The current study used alanine scanning mutation to understand RegIIA's selectivity profile at the α3β4 nAChR subtype. [N11A] and [N12A] RegIIA analogues exhibited three-fold more selectivity for the α3β4 than the α3β2 nAChR subtype. We also report synthesis of [N11A,N12A]RegIIA, a selective α3β4 nAChR antagonist (IC50 of 370 nM) that could potentially be used in the treatment of lung cancer and nicotine addiction. Molecular dynamics simulations of RegIIA and [N11A,N12A]RegIIA bound to α3β4 and α3β2 suggest that destabilization of toxin contacts with a number of residues at both the principal and complementary faces of α3β2 (α3 - Y92, S149, Y189, C192 and Y196; β2 - W57, R81 and F119) may form the molecular basis for the selectivity shift.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Chemistry 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#957,229
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#513
of 85,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,072
of 369,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#13
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.