↓ Skip to main content

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: The First 50 Cases

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: The First 50 Cases
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2015
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-4289-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Hayes-Jordan, Holly Green, Heather Lin, Pascal Owusu-Agyemang, Rodrigo Mejia, Regina Okhuysen-Cawley, Jose Cortes, Nancy E. Fitzgerald, Mary Frances McAleer, Cynthia Herzog, Winston W. Huh, Peter Anderson

Abstract

Extensive peritoneal metastatic disease is rare in children. Although usually manifested as carcinomatosis in adults, sarcomatosis is more common in children. The authors began a pediatric hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) program, and this report describes their initial results from the first 50 pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Researcher 7 13%
Other 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Philosophy 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,717
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,392
of 363,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#68
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.