↓ Skip to main content

Benchmarking of performance of Mexican states with effective coverage

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benchmarking of performance of Mexican states with effective coverage
Published in
The Lancet, November 2006
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69566-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Lozano, Patricia Soliz, Emmanuela Gakidou, Jesse Abbott-Klafter, Dennis M Feehan, Cecilia Vidal, Juan Pablo Ortiz, Christopher JL Murray

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 230 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 23%
Researcher 48 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 29 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 27%
Social Sciences 41 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 7%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 37 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,140,021
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#13,033
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,335
of 93,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#43
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.