↓ Skip to main content

Spatial organization of chromosome territories in the interphase nucleus of trisomy 21 cells

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosoma, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Spatial organization of chromosome territories in the interphase nucleus of trisomy 21 cells
Published in
Chromosoma, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00412-017-0653-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan Kemeny, Christophe Tatout, Gaelle Salaun, Céline Pebrel-Richard, Carole Goumy, Natasha Ollier, Eugenie Maurin, Bruno Pereira, Philippe Vago, Laetitia Gouas

Abstract

In the interphase cell nucleus, chromosomes adopt a conserved and non-random arrangement in subnuclear domains called chromosome territories (CTs). Whereas chromosome translocation can affect CT organization in tumor cell nuclei, little is known about how aneuploidies can impact CT organization. Here, we performed 3D-FISH on control and trisomic 21 nuclei to track the patterning of chromosome territories, focusing on the radial distribution of trisomic HSA21 as well as 11 disomic chromosomes. We have established an experimental design based on cultured chorionic villus cells which keep their original mesenchymal features including a characteristic ellipsoid nuclear morphology and a radial CT distribution that correlates with chromosome size. Our study suggests that in trisomy 21 nuclei, the extra HSA21 induces a shift of HSA1 and HSA3 CTs out toward a more peripheral position in nuclear space and a higher compaction of HSA1 and HSA17 CTs. We posit that the presence of a supernumerary chromosome 21 alters chromosome compaction and results in displacement of other chromosome territories from their usual nuclear position.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 32%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,403,045
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Chromosoma
#582
of 783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,054
of 448,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosoma
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 783 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.