You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary Patient-Derived Cancer Cells and Their Potential for Personalized Cancer Patient Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David P. Kodack, Anna F. Farago, Anahita Dastur, Matthew A. Held, Leila Dardaei, Luc Friboulet, Friedrich von Flotow, Leah J. Damon, Dana Lee, Melissa Parks, Richard Dicecca, Max Greenberg, Krystina E. Kattermann, Amanda K. Riley, Florian J. Fintelmann, Coleen Rizzo, Zofia Piotrowska, Alice T. Shaw, Justin F. Gainor, Lecia V. Sequist, Matthew J. Niederst, Jeffrey A. Engelman, Cyril H. Benes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Comoros | 1 | 6% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 335 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 19% |
| Researcher | 55 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 98 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 99 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
| Engineering | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 117 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,791,102
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#4,076
of 13,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,994
of 447,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#94
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.