↓ Skip to main content

Soil is the origin for the presence of Naegleria fowleri in the thermal recreational waters

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Soil is the origin for the presence of Naegleria fowleri in the thermal recreational waters
Published in
Parasitology Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00436-014-4197-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirna Moussa, Océane Tissot, Jérôme Guerlotté, Johan F. De Jonckheere, Antoine Talarmin

Abstract

Naegleria fowleri is found in most geothermal baths of Guadeloupe and has been responsible for the death of a 9-year-old boy who swam in one of these baths in 2008. We wanted to determine the origin for the presence of this amoeba in the water. Water samples were taken at the origin of the geothermal sources and at the arrival in the baths. After filtration, cultures were made and the number of Naegleria present was determined using the most probable number method. Soil samples collected in the proximity of the baths were also tested for the presence of thermophilic amoebae. The species identification was obtained by PCR. During three consecutive months, no Naegleria could be found at the origin of any geothermal source tested. In contrast, N. fowleri was isolated at least once in all baths at the arrival of the water, except one. Thermophilic amoebae could be found in each soil sample, especially near the baths located at a lower altitude, but N. fowleri was only isolated near two baths, which were also the baths most often contaminated with this species. So it appears that the contamination of the water with N. fowleri occurs after emerging from the geothermal source when the water runs over the soil. Therefore, it should be possible to reduce the concentration of N. fowleri in the geothermal baths of Guadeloupe to for example less than 1 N. fowleri/10 L by installing a pipeline between the geothermal sources and the baths and by preventing flooding water from entering the baths after rainfall. By taking these measures, we were able to eliminate N. fowleri from a pool located inside a reeducation clinic.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,945,971
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#534
of 3,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,289
of 260,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#11
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.