↓ Skip to main content

The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Molecular Chaperone Deregulation in Alzheimer’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
36 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Molecular Chaperone Deregulation in Alzheimer’s Disease
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12035-014-9063-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanuar Alan Sulistio, Klaus Heese

Abstract

One of the shared hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases is the accumulation of misfolded proteins. Therefore, it is suspected that normal proteostasis is crucial for neuronal survival in the brain and that the malfunction of this mechanism may be the underlying cause of neurodegenerative diseases. The accumulation of amyloid plaques (APs) composed of amyloid-beta peptide (Aβ) aggregates and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of misfolded Tau proteins are the defining pathological markers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The accumulation of these proteins indicates a faulty protein quality control in the AD brain. An impaired ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) could lead to negative consequences for protein regulation, including loss of function. Another pivotal mechanism for the prevention of misfolded protein accumulation is the utilization of molecular chaperones. Molecular chaperones, such as heat shock proteins (HSPs) and FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs), are highly involved in protein regulation to ensure proper folding and normal function. In this review, we elaborate on the molecular basis of AD pathophysiology using recent data, with a particular focus on the role of the UPS and molecular chaperones as the defensive mechanism against misfolded proteins that have prion-like properties. In addition, we propose a rational therapy approach based on this mechanism.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 26%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 23%
Neuroscience 13 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Chemistry 6 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,103,574
of 24,040,389 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#460
of 3,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,614
of 360,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#7
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,040,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.