You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61213-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Danuta Wasserman, Christina W Hoven, Camilla Wasserman, Melanie Wall, Ruth Eisenberg, Gergö Hadlaczky, Ian Kelleher, Marco Sarchiapone, Alan Apter, Judit Balazs, Julio Bobes, Romuald Brunner, Paul Corcoran, Doina Cosman, Francis Guillemin, Christian Haring, Miriam Iosue, Michael Kaess, Jean-Pierre Kahn, Helen Keeley, George J Musa, Bogdan Nemes, Vita Postuvan, Pilar Saiz, Stella Reiter-Theil, Airi Varnik, Peeter Varnik, Vladimir Carli |
Abstract |
Suicidal behaviours in adolescents are a major public health problem and evidence-based prevention programmes are greatly needed. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of school-based preventive interventions of suicidal behaviours. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 427 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 102 | 24% |
United States | 33 | 8% |
Australia | 30 | 7% |
Sweden | 25 | 6% |
Canada | 23 | 5% |
Netherlands | 8 | 2% |
Norway | 5 | 1% |
Spain | 5 | 1% |
Ireland | 4 | <1% |
Other | 26 | 6% |
Unknown | 166 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 294 | 69% |
Scientists | 64 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 62 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 1% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 803 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 792 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 121 | 15% |
Researcher | 99 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 96 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 49 | 6% |
Other | 154 | 19% |
Unknown | 208 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 203 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 74 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 2% |
Other | 78 | 10% |
Unknown | 239 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 466. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#59,162
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,021
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#529
of 364,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#4
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.