↓ Skip to main content

School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
12 policy sources
twitter
427 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
463 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
803 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61213-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danuta Wasserman, Christina W Hoven, Camilla Wasserman, Melanie Wall, Ruth Eisenberg, Gergö Hadlaczky, Ian Kelleher, Marco Sarchiapone, Alan Apter, Judit Balazs, Julio Bobes, Romuald Brunner, Paul Corcoran, Doina Cosman, Francis Guillemin, Christian Haring, Miriam Iosue, Michael Kaess, Jean-Pierre Kahn, Helen Keeley, George J Musa, Bogdan Nemes, Vita Postuvan, Pilar Saiz, Stella Reiter-Theil, Airi Varnik, Peeter Varnik, Vladimir Carli

Abstract

Suicidal behaviours in adolescents are a major public health problem and evidence-based prevention programmes are greatly needed. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of school-based preventive interventions of suicidal behaviours.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 427 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 803 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 792 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 121 15%
Researcher 99 12%
Student > Bachelor 96 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 6%
Other 154 19%
Unknown 208 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 203 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 134 17%
Social Sciences 74 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Other 78 10%
Unknown 239 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 466. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#59,162
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,021
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#529
of 364,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#4
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.