↓ Skip to main content

Reciprocal Relationships: the Genetic Counselor‐Patient Relationship Following a Life‐Limiting Prenatal Diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Reciprocal Relationships: the Genetic Counselor‐Patient Relationship Following a Life‐Limiting Prenatal Diagnosis
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10897-016-0016-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. R. Williams, K. L. Berrier, K. Redlinger‐Grosse, J. G. Edwards

Abstract

Utilizing the tenet, "Relationship is integral to the genetic counseling process" from the Reciprocal Engagement Model (REM) of genetic counseling practice, this study sought to explore the relationship between the genetic counselor and patient following a "life-limiting" prenatal diagnosis that resulted in a major loss (termination, stillbirth/miscarriage, or neonatal death). The specific aims of this study were to: 1) Understand and describe aspects of the genetic counselor-patient relationship in the context of the life-limiting prenatal diagnosis, and identify characteristics and actions of the 2) genetic counselor and 3) patient that influence the relationship. Genetic counselor (GC) participants were recruited via a web-based survey distributed by NSGC and the NSGC Prenatal SIG. Eligible GCs maintained a relationship with a patient beyond the prenatal diagnosis and had a willing patient participant. Individual 60-min audio-recorded telephone interviews were conducted with eight GC and 8 respective patients (n = 16) using parallel interview guides (n = 16). Transcriptions underwent thematic content analysis for systematic coding and identification of emergent themes. The GC-patient relationship was characterized by the evolution of communication and promoted by the supportive needs of the patient, the nature of the diagnosis, and characteristics and supportive actions of the participants. This exploratory study highlights the unique service of support offered by genetic counselors in the context of a life-limiting prenatal diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 27%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 24%
Social Sciences 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,578,649
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#956
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,391
of 316,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#25
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.