↓ Skip to main content

PREPARE: presurgery physiotherapy for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Spine Journal, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
422 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PREPARE: presurgery physiotherapy for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Spine Journal, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Lindbäck, Hans Tropp, Paul Enthoven, Allan Abbott, Birgitta Öberg

Abstract

- Surgery due to disc herniation, or spinal stenosis results mostly in large improvement in the short-term, but mild to moderate improvements for pain and disability at long-term follow-up. Prehabilitation has been defined as augmenting functional capacity prior to surgery, which may have beneficial effect on outcome after surgery. - The aim was to study if pre-surgery physiotherapy improves function, pain and health in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder scheduled for surgery. - A single blinded, 2-arm, RCT. - 197 patients were consecutively included at a Spine Clinic. The inclusion criteria were; patients scheduled for surgery due to disc herniation, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis or DDD, 25 to 80 years of age. - Primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes were pain intensity, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, fear avoidance, physical activity and treatment effect. - Patients were randomized to either - pre-surgery physiotherapy or standardized information, with follow-up after the pre-surgery intervention as well as 3 and 12 months post-surgery. The study was funded by regional research funds for US$77,342. No conflict of interest is declared. - The pre-surgery physiotherapy group had better ODI, VAS back pain, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, FABQ-PA, SES and HADS depression scores and activity level compared to the waiting-list group after the pre-surgery intervention. The improvements were small, but larger than the study specific minimal clinical important change (MCIC) in VAS back and leg pain, EQ-5D and FABQ-PA and almost in line with MCIC in ODI and PCS in the physiotherapy-group. Post-surgery difference between groups only maintained for higher activity level in the physiotherapy-group. - Pre-surgery physiotherapy decreases pain, risk for avoidance behavior and worsening of psychological well-being and improves quality of life, and physical activity levels prior to surgery compared to waiting-list controls. These results were only maintained for activity levels post-surgery. Still, pre-surgery selection, content, dosage of exercises and importance of being active in a pre-surgery physiotherapy intervention is of interest to study further to improve long-term outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 422 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 13%
Student > Master 46 11%
Unspecified 37 9%
Researcher 35 8%
Other 30 7%
Other 83 20%
Unknown 138 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 17%
Unspecified 37 9%
Psychology 19 5%
Sports and Recreations 15 4%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 151 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,757,283
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Spine Journal
#779
of 3,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,535
of 444,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine Journal
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.