↓ Skip to main content

Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
363 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
637 Mendeley
Title
Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10295-010-0812-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Misook Kim, Donal F Day

Abstract

A challenge facing the biofuel industry is to develop an economically viable and sustainable biorefinery. The existing potential biorefineries in Louisiana, raw sugar mills, operate only 3 months of the year. For year-round operation, they must adopt other feedstocks, besides sugar cane, as supplemental feedstocks. Energy cane and sweet sorghum have different harvest times, but can be processed for bio-ethanol using the same equipment. Juice of energy cane contains 9.8% fermentable sugars and that of sweet sorghum, 11.8%. Chemical composition of sugar cane bagasse was determined to be 42% cellulose, 25% hemicellulose, and 20% lignin, and that of energy cane was 43% cellulose, 24% hemicellulose, and 22% lignin. Sweet sorghum was 45% cellulose, 27% hemicellulose, and 21% lignin. Theoretical ethanol yields would be 3,609 kg per ha from sugar cane, 12,938 kg per ha from energy cane, and 5,804 kg per ha from sweet sorghum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 637 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Uruguay 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 620 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 16%
Student > Bachelor 89 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 13%
Researcher 72 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 6%
Other 102 16%
Unknown 151 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 22%
Engineering 90 14%
Chemical Engineering 65 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 6%
Chemistry 33 5%
Other 83 13%
Unknown 185 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,019,934
of 23,656,895 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#81
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,706
of 95,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,656,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.