| Title |
Influence of short-term unweighing and reloading on running kinetics and muscle activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-3095-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Sainton, Caroline Nicol, Jan Cabri, Joëlle Barthelemy-Montfort, Eric Berton, Pascale Chavet |
| Abstract |
In running, body weight reduction is reported to result in decreased lower limb muscle activity with no change in the global activation pattern (Liebenberg et al. in J Sports Sci 29:207-214). Our study examined the acute effects on running mechanics and lower limb muscle activity of short-term unweighing and reloading conditions while running on a treadmill with a lower body positive pressure (LBPP) device. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 79% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 33 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,442,029
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#800
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,504
of 358,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#22
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.