| Title |
Insight into Microwave-Assisted Lipase Catalyzed Synthesis of Geranyl Cinnamate: Optimization and Kinetic Modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12010-014-1367-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Somnath D. Shinde, Ganapati D. Yadav |
| Abstract |
Cinnamate esters have gained importance due to their unique antioxidant, flavor, and fragrance properties. Synergism of microwave irradiation and enzyme catalysis was investigated in transesterification of ethyl cinnamate and geraniol. Effects of different operating parameters such as biocatalyst, solvent, and temperature were first studied. An increase in initial rates up to 4.2-fold was observed under microwave irradiation vis-a-vis conventional heating. Further, the Taguchi L16 (4*4) orthogonal array design with four level-four variables and 16 run was employed for the optimization of parameters including enzyme loading, temperature, speed of agitation, and substrate mole ratio. Optimal conditions obtained via the Taguchi approach were as follows: enzyme loading, 60 mg; temperature, 65 °C; speed of agitation, 300 rpm; and substrate mole ratio, 1:2. The analysis of initial rate data established the validity of the ternary complex ordered bi-bi mechanism with inhibition by geraniol. The experimental data fitted very well with the model predictions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 22% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,388,295
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1,772
of 2,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,144
of 361,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#29
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,500 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.