| Title |
Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Management at Bedside: A Single-Center Pilot Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurocritical Care, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12028-014-0103-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Celeste Dias, Maria João Silva, Eduarda Pereira, Elisabete Monteiro, Isabel Maia, Silvina Barbosa, Sofia Silva, Teresa Honrado, António Cerejo, Marcel J. H. Aries, Peter Smielewski, José-Artur Paiva, Marek Czosnyka |
| Abstract |
Guidelines recommend cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) values of 50-70 mmHg and intracranial pressure lower than 20 mmHg for the management of acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, adequate individual targets are still poorly addressed, since patients have different perfusion thresholds. Bedside assessment of cerebral autoregulation may help to optimize individual CPP-guided treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 26% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 36% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 12% |
| Engineering | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,300,485
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#404
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,389
of 364,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.