| Title |
Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Higher Education, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3 |
| Authors |
Joanna Tai, Rola Ajjawi, David Boud, Phillip Dawson, Ernesto Panadero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 45 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 22% |
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Ireland | 6 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Norway | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 56 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 111 | 66% |
| Scientists | 48 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 616 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 616 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 65 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 9% |
| Researcher | 47 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 137 | 22% |
| Unknown | 194 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 121 | 20% |
| Psychology | 31 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 31 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 26 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 26 | 4% |
| Other | 157 | 25% |
| Unknown | 224 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#238,984
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#8
of 1,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,188
of 448,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.