↓ Skip to main content

Mindfulness, Eating Behaviours, and Obesity: A Review and Reflection on Current Findings

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mindfulness, Eating Behaviours, and Obesity: A Review and Reflection on Current Findings
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13679-014-0131-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michail Mantzios, Janet Clare Wilson

Abstract

Mindfulness and mindful eating have become popular in recent years. In this review, we first explore what mindfulness is in the context of psychological research, and why it offers promise for eating behaviours and weight loss. Second, we review the main empirical findings for weight loss in mindfulness-based intervention programmes. Third, contradictions in the findings are explored in more depth, and suggestions are made regarding why they may be occurring. Fourth, the benefits of adding self-compassion (and compassion) training to mindfulness practise to assist weight loss is discussed. Finally, the limitations of the research literature (and possible solutions) are explored. Overall, it is concluded that while mindfulness meditations that specifically focus on eating may be extremely helpful in promoting better eating behaviours, and assist in weight regulation, work is still needed to make such interventions appeal to a wider audience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 352 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 20%
Student > Bachelor 42 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 11%
Researcher 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 96 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 82 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 10%
Social Sciences 19 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 5%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 116 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,146,247
of 23,940,793 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#81
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,993
of 358,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.