↓ Skip to main content

New Media but Same Old Tricks: Food Marketing to Children in the Digital Age

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
Title
New Media but Same Old Tricks: Food Marketing to Children in the Digital Age
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13679-014-0128-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bridget Kelly, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Becky Freeman, Gabrielle Jenkin

Abstract

'New media' refers to digital technologies, which offer unmatched opportunities for food companies to engage with young people. This paper explores the emergence of food marketing using new media, the potential impact of this marketing on young people, and current and potential policy responses to limit exposure to these promotions. Foremost in any informed policy discussion is the need for robust evidence to demonstrate the need for intervention. In this case, such evidence relates to the extent of children's exposures to commercial food promotions via new media, and the nature of these promotions. Approaches to, and challenges of, collecting and assessing these data are discussed. There is accumulating evidence that food marketing on new media is increasing and influences children's food preferences and choices. The impact of integrated campaigns, which reinforce commercial messages across multiple platforms, and of new media, which engage personally with potential consumers, is likely to be greater than that of traditional marketing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 306 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 15%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Lecturer 16 5%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 94 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 34 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 11%
Social Sciences 25 8%
Psychology 17 5%
Other 57 18%
Unknown 108 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,871,057
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#116
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,705
of 362,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.