↓ Skip to main content

Syk is indispensable for CpG-induced activation and differentiation of human B cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Syk is indispensable for CpG-induced activation and differentiation of human B cells
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00018-014-1806-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariann Kremlitzka, Bernadett Mácsik-Valent, Anna Erdei

Abstract

B cells are efficiently activated by CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and antibody (Ab). Here, we describe a so far unidentified, spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk)-dependent pathway, which is indispensable for CpG-induced human B cell activation. We show that triggering of B cells by CpG results in Syk and src kinase phosphorylation, proliferation, as well as cytokine and Ab production independent of the BCR. Notably, all these functions are abrogated when Syk is inhibited. We demonstrate that CpG-induced Syk activation originates from the cell surface in a TLR9-dependent manner. While inhibition of Syk does not influence the uptake of CpG ODNs, activation of the kinase is a prerequisite for the delivery of CpG into TLR9-containing endolysosomes and for the CpG-induced up-regulation of TLR9 expression. Our results reveal an alternative, Syk-dependent pathway of CpG-induced B cell stimulation, which is initiated at the plasma membrane and seems to be an upstream requirement for endosomal TLR9-driven B cell proliferation and differentiation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,530,416
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#3,334
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,225
of 357,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#29
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.