| Title |
Robot-assisted spine surgery: feasibility study through a prospective case-matched analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-015-3758-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Lonjon, Emilie Chan-Seng, Vincent Costalat, Benoit Bonnafoux, Matthieu Vassal, Julien Boetto |
| Abstract |
While image guidance and neuronavigation have enabled a more accurate placement of pedicle implants, they can inconvenience the surgeon. Robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws appears to overcome these disadvantages. However, recent data concerning the superiority of currently available robots in assisting spinal surgeons are conflicting. The aim of our study was to evaluate the percentage of accurately placed pedicle screws, inserted using a new robotic-guidance system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Finland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 33% |
| Engineering | 23 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,350,149
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,599
of 5,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,229
of 363,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#17
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.