↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of the Greulich and Pyle method for chronological age estimation and age majority prediction in a Spanish sample

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Reliability of the Greulich and Pyle method for chronological age estimation and age majority prediction in a Spanish sample
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00414-017-1760-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Alcina, A. Lucea, M. Salicrú, D. Turbón

Abstract

Estimating the forensic age of living individuals is ever more important in forensic practice, due to the ongoing increase of migratory flows, amongst other causes. Using the Greulich and Pyle method on a sample of 1150 individuals of the Spanish population (n = 560, 0-18 years for girls, and n = 590, 0-19 years for boys), the mean difference between the bone and chronological ages was obtained: 0.01 years (- 0.81, + 0.92) for girls and 0.33 years (- 1.15, + 0.34) for boys. For a same class of age and sex, the inherent variability was also evaluated: [Formula: see text] (0.41-1.25) for girls and [Formula: see text]years (0.36-1.76) for boys. To minimise systematic errors with regard to the reference population, adjustment factors are proposed for each age and sex. A sequential classification criterion based on decision trees is postulated to improve reliability in the prediction of maturity. Implementation of the decision criterion in three categories enables the doubtful individuals to be separated into the category of "undetermined" and to satisfactorily classify in the categories of "mature" and "under age": 0.96 (0.86-0.99) specificity; 1.00 (0.92-1.00) specificity; and 1.00 (0.92-1.00) predictive value.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 32%
Computer Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,877,863
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#728
of 2,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,232
of 440,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#16
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,084 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.