↓ Skip to main content

A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
394 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
827 Mendeley
Title
A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00167-006-0045-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Gustavsson, Camille Neeter, Pia Thomeé, Karin Grävare Silbernagel, Jesper Augustsson, Roland Thomeé, Jon Karlsson

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a test battery of hop tests with high ability to discriminate (i.e. high test-retest reliability, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) between the hop performance of the injured and the uninjured side in patients with an ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Five hop tests were analysed: three maximum single hop tests and two hop tests while developing fatigue. Fifteen healthy subjects performed the five hop tests on three separate occasions in a test-retest design. Thirty patients, mean 11 months after an ACL injury and 35 patients, mean 6 months after ACL reconstruction were tested. ICC values ranged from 0.85 to 0.97 for the five hop tests, indicating that all the tests had high test-retest reliability. Sixty-seven percent to 100% of the healthy subjects had normal symmetry (i.e. <10% side-to-side difference) in the five hop tests. Abnormal symmetry in the five hop tests ranged from 43 to 77% for patients with an ACL injury and from 51 to 86% for patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction respectively. The three tests with the highest ability to discriminate hop performance were chosen for the test battery; they were the vertical jump, the hop for distance and the side hop. The test battery revealed a high level of sensitivity and accuracy in patients with an ACL injury (87 and 84%) and in patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction (91 and 88%), when at least one of the three tests was classified as abnormal. To summarise, the test battery consisting of both maximum single hop performances: the vertical jump and the hop for distance and hop performance while developing fatigue: the side hop, produced high test-retest reliability, sensitivity and accuracy. Further, the test battery produced higher values compared with any of the three hop tests individually revealing that only one out of ten patients had restored hop performance 11 months after an ACL injury and 6 months after ACL reconstruction. It is concluded that this test battery showed a high ability to discriminate between the hop performance of the injured and the uninjured side both in patients with an ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 827 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 810 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 163 20%
Student > Bachelor 149 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 9%
Researcher 57 7%
Other 47 6%
Other 146 18%
Unknown 191 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 179 22%
Sports and Recreations 175 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 151 18%
Engineering 25 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 2%
Other 55 7%
Unknown 227 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,620,952
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#279
of 2,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,906
of 70,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.