↓ Skip to main content

Bud bank dynamics and clonal growth strategy in the rhizomatous grass, Pascopyrum smithii

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Ecology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Bud bank dynamics and clonal growth strategy in the rhizomatous grass, Pascopyrum smithii
Published in
Plant Ecology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11258-014-0444-6
Authors

Jacqueline P. Ott, David C. Hartnett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 39%
Environmental Science 8 24%
Unspecified 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,388,295
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Plant Ecology
#653
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,168
of 352,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Ecology
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.