↓ Skip to main content

Degree of prescriber’s knowledge about variability in biological drugs “innovators” in manufacturing process

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Degree of prescriber’s knowledge about variability in biological drugs “innovators” in manufacturing process
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00228-017-2397-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucía Jiménez-Pichardo, Rocío Gázquez-Pérez, Jesús Francisco Sierra-Sánchez

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyse the degree of prescribers' knowledge about the regulation and variability in manufacturing processes (MP) in bio-drugs "innovators" (BI). For each selected drugs, the date of authorization by the European Medicines Agency, time elapsed until the first change, total number of changes and annual rate of change (ARC) were recorded. A survey was designed with 4 parts: (a) identifying the BI prescribed; (b) knowledge of the number and ARC of each BI during its MP; (c) knowledge of comparability requirement of BI before or after the MP; (d) evaluating the utility of the information in the survey. Drugs selected and total number of changes: infliximab (41), adalimumab (20), abatacept (13), golimumab (7), etanercept (18), tocilizumab (6) and certolizumab. All BI had been changed in the MP after their authorisation. The survey was answered by 35 professionals from rheumatology, digestive and dermatology area. They had prescribed one or more drugs included in the survey at least once. Sixty-three percent of prescribers did not know the existence of changes relative to the MP. Thirty-seven percent of prescribers knew of their existence, but not about number or frequency. Fifty-seven percent of prescribers did not know the regulation about the comparability among BI. The rest of them knew it, but 29% related it only to biosimilar drugs. Ninety-four percent of prescribers identified information as useful. BI present a high ARC during their MP after their commercialization, without any efficacy or safety difficulties. Knowledge of this might increase confidence for biosimilars.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,928,449
of 24,315,442 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#119
of 2,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,974
of 448,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,315,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.