You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Contemporary Bloodletting in Cardiac Surgical Care
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.062 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Colleen G. Koch, Edmunds Z. Reineks, Anne S. Tang, Eric D. Hixson, Shannon Phillips, Joseph F. Sabik, J. Michael Henderson, Eugene H. Blackstone |
Abstract |
Health care providers are seldom aware of the frequency and volume of phlebotomy for laboratory testing, bloodletting that often leads to hospital-acquired anemia. Our objectives were to examine the frequency of laboratory testing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, calculate cumulative phlebotomy volume from time of initial surgical consultation to hospital discharge, and propose strategies to reduce phlebotomy volume. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 46% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 59 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 14% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 30% |
Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,063,315
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#165
of 8,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,581
of 362,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#1
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.