↓ Skip to main content

ABA Versus TEACCH: The Case for Defining and Validating Comprehensive Treatment Models in Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
Title
ABA Versus TEACCH: The Case for Defining and Validating Comprehensive Treatment Models in Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0834-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Callahan, Smita Shukla-Mehta, Sandy Magee, Min Wie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 348 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 10%
Researcher 26 7%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 64 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 119 33%
Social Sciences 71 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Arts and Humanities 11 3%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 74 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,861
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,867
of 113,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#23
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.