↓ Skip to main content

Do fecal odors from native and non‐native predators cause a habitat shift among macropods?

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Society Bulletin, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do fecal odors from native and non‐native predators cause a habitat shift among macropods?
Published in
Wildlife Society Bulletin, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/wsb.509
Authors

Tarnya E. Cox, Peter J. Murray, Andrew J. Bengsen, Graham P. Hall, Xiuhua Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 9 31%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 52%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#996
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,102
of 360,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.