↓ Skip to main content

Neurodevelopmental synaptopathies: Insights from behaviour in rodent models of synapse gene mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurodevelopmental synaptopathies: Insights from behaviour in rodent models of synapse gene mutations
Published in
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.12.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Luo, R.H. Norris, S.L. Gordon, J. Nithianantharajah

Abstract

The genomic revolution has begun to unveil the enormous complexity and heterogeneity of the genetic basis of neurodevelopmental disorders such as such epilepsy, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia. Increasingly, human mutations in synapse genes are being identified across these disorders. These neurodevelopmental synaptopathies highlight synaptic homeostasis pathways as a convergence point underlying disease mechanisms. Here, we review some of the key pre- and postsynaptic genes in which penetrant human mutations have been identified in neurodevelopmental disorders for which genetic rodent models have been generated. Specifically, we focus on the main behavioural phenotypes that have been documented in these animal models, to consolidate our current understanding of how synapse genes regulate key behavioural and cognitive domains. These studies provide insights into better understanding the basis of the overlapping genetic and cognitive heterogeneity observed in neurodevelopmental disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 22 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Psychology 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,745,807
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry
#1,697
of 2,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,863
of 445,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry
#20
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.