↓ Skip to main content

A boreal invasion in response to climate change? Range shifts and community effects in the borderland between forest and tundra

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
A boreal invasion in response to climate change? Range shifts and community effects in the borderland between forest and tundra
Published in
Ambio, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0606-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bodil Elmhagen, Jonas Kindberg, Peter Hellström, Anders Angerbjörn

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that climate warming will allow southern species to advance north and invade northern ecosystems. We review the changes in the Swedish mammal and bird community in boreal forest and alpine tundra since the nineteenth century, as well as suggested drivers of change. Observed changes include (1) range expansion and increased abundance in southern birds, ungulates, and carnivores; (2) range contraction and decline in northern birds and carnivores; and (3) abundance decline or periodically disrupted dynamics in cyclic populations of small and medium-sized mammals and birds. The first warm spell, 1930-1960, stands out as a period of substantial faunal change. However, in addition to climate warming, suggested drivers of change include land use and other anthropogenic factors. We hypothesize all these drivers interacted, primarily favoring southern generalists. Future research should aim to distinguish between effects of climate and land-use change in boreal and tundra ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 209 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 17%
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Unspecified 10 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 46 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 36%
Environmental Science 54 25%
Unspecified 10 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 48 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#833,059
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#116
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,509
of 362,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.