↓ Skip to main content

The Prognostic Value of Amplitude-Integrated EEG in Full-Term Neonates with Seizures

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Prognostic Value of Amplitude-Integrated EEG in Full-Term Neonates with Seizures
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0078960
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dandan Zhang, Haiyan Ding, Lili Liu, Xinlin Hou, Guoyu Sun, Lei Li, Yunzhe Liu, Congle Zhou, Ruolei Gu, Yuejia Luo

Abstract

Neonatal seizures pose a high risk for adverse outcome in survived infants. While the prognostic value of amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG) is well established in neonates with encephalopathy and asphyxia, neonatal seizure studies focusing on the direct correlation between early aEEG measurement and subsequent neurologic outcome are scarce. In this study, the prognostic value of aEEG features was systematically analyzed in 143 full-term neonates to identify prognostic indicators of neurodevelopmental outcome. Neonatal aEEG features of background pattern, cyclicity, and seizure activity, as well as the etiology of neonatal seizures, were significantly associated with neurodevelopmental outcome at one year of age. aEEG background pattern was highly associated with neurologic outcomes (χ² = 116.9), followed by aEEG cyclicity (χ² = 87.2) and seizure etiology (χ² = 79.3). Multiple linear regression showed that the four predictors explained 71.2% of the variation in neurological outcome, with standardized β coefficients of 0.44, 0.24, 0.22, and 0.14 for the predictors of aEEG background pattern, cyclicity, etiology, and aEEG seizure activity, respectively. This clinically applicable scoring system based on etiology and three aEEG indices would allow pediatricians to assess the risk for neurodevelopmental impairment and facilitate an early intervention in newborns developing seizures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Postgraduate 9 16%
Other 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 36%
Neuroscience 10 18%
Engineering 6 11%
Psychology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#21,709,675
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#187,608
of 208,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,209
of 217,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,489
of 5,129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.