↓ Skip to main content

Experimental focal neocortical epilepsy is associated with reduced white matter volume growth: results from multiparametric MRI analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Experimental focal neocortical epilepsy is associated with reduced white matter volume growth: results from multiparametric MRI analysis
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00429-013-0633-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem M. Otte, Maurits P. A. van Meer, Kajo van der Marel, René Zwartbol, Max A. Viergever, Kees P. J. Braun, Rick M. Dijkhuizen

Abstract

Focal epilepsy has recently been associated with remote white matter damage, including reduced white matter volume. Longitudinal assessment of these white matter changes, in relation to functional mechanisms and consequences, may be ideally done by in vivo neuroimaging in well-controlled experimental animal models. We assessed whether advanced machine learning algorithm models could accurately detect volumetric changes in white matter from multiparametric MR images, longitudinally collected in a neocortical focal epilepsy rat model. We measured classification accuracy in two supervised segmentation models: i.e. the generalized linear model and the nonlinear random forest model-by comparing computed white matter probabilities with actual neuroanatomically identified white matter. We found excellent overall discriminatory power for both models. However, the random forest model demonstrated a superior goodness-of-fit calibration plot that was close to the ideal calibration line. Based on this model, we measured that total white matter volume increased in young adult control and epileptic rats over a period of 10 weeks, but the average white matter volume was significantly lower in the focal epilepsy group. Changes in gray matter volume were not significantly different between control and epileptic rats. Our results (1) indicate that recurrent spontaneous seizures have an adverse effect on global white matter growth and (2) show that individual whole brain white matter volume can be accurately determined using a combination of multiparametric MRI and supervised segmentation models, offering a powerful tool to assess white matter volume changes in preclinical studies of neurological disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 30%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Unspecified 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Unspecified 3 10%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#21,699,788
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#1,524
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,101
of 202,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.