↓ Skip to main content

Genetics and Underlying Pathology of Dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genetics and Underlying Pathology of Dementia
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11065-014-9276-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beata Ferencz, Lotte Gerritsen

Abstract

As the population steadily ages, dementia, in all its forms, remains a great societal challenge. Yet, our knowledge of their etiology remains rather limited. To this end, genetic studies can give us insight into the underlying mechanisms that lead to the development of dementia, potentially facilitating treatments in the future. In this review we cover the most recent genetic risk factors associated with the onset of the four most common dementia types today, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Vascular Dementia (VaD), Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD) and Lewy Body Dementia (LBD). Moreover, we discuss the overlap in major underlying pathologies of dementia derived from their genetic associations. While all four dementia types appear to involve genes associated with tau-pathology and neuroinflammation only LBD, AD and VaD appear to involve amyloid genes while LBD and FTLD share alpha synuclein genes. Together these findings suggest that some of the dementias may exist along a spectrum and demonstrates the necessity to conduct large-scale studies pinpointing the etiology of the dementias and potential gene and environment interactions that may influence their development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 177 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 62 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Neuroscience 11 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 67 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,236,451
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#342
of 465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,511
of 355,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.