You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Preventive Medicine, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.041 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine M. Murtagh, Linda Nichols, Mohammed A. Mohammed, Roger Holder, Alan M. Nevill, Marie H. Murphy |
| Abstract |
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials that examined the effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 22 | 21% |
| Netherlands | 14 | 13% |
| Spain | 7 | 7% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 64% |
| Scientists | 24 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 269 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 19% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 35 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 11% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Unknown | 81 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#272,095
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#130
of 5,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,037
of 360,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#3
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.