↓ Skip to main content

The Role of the Cerebellum in Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in The Cerebellum, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 983)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
The Role of the Cerebellum in Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
The Cerebellum, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12311-014-0634-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrin Weier, Brenda Banwell, Antonio Cerasa, D. Louis Collins, Anne-Marie Dogonowski, Hans Lassmann, Aldo Quattrone, Mohammad A. Sahraian, Hartwig R. Siebner, Till Sprenger

Abstract

In multiple sclerosis (MS), cerebellar signs and symptoms as well as cognitive dysfunction are frequent and contribute to clinical disability with only poor response to symptomatic treatment. The current consensus paper highlights the broad range of clinical signs and symptoms of MS patients, which relate to cerebellar dysfunction. There is considerable evidence of cerebellar involvement in MS based on clinical, histopathological as well as structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. The review of the recent literature, however, also demonstrates a high variability of results. These discrepancies are, at least partially, caused by the use of different techniques and substantial heterogeneity among the patient cohorts in terms of disease duration, number of patients, and progressive vs. relapsing disease courses. Moreover, the majority of studies were cross-sectional, providing little insight into the dynamics of cerebellar involvement in MS. Some links between the histopathological changes, the structural and functional abnormalities as captured by MRI, cerebellar dysfunction, and the clinical consequences are starting to emerge and warrant further study. A consensus is formed that this line of research will benefit from advances in neuroimaging techniques that allow to trace cerebellar involvement at higher resolution. Using a prospective study design, multimodal high-resolution cerebellar imaging is highly promising, particularly in patients who present with radiologically or clinically isolated syndromes or newly diagnosed MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 29%
Neuroscience 20 17%
Psychology 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,894,218
of 24,994,150 outputs
Outputs from The Cerebellum
#41
of 983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,373
of 364,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Cerebellum
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,994,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 983 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.