↓ Skip to main content

Convex hull and tour crossings in the Euclidean traveling salesperson problem: Implications for human performance studies

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Convex hull and tour crossings in the Euclidean traveling salesperson problem: Implications for human performance studies
Published in
Memory & Cognition, March 2003
DOI 10.3758/bf03194380
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris Van Rooij, Ulrike Stege, Alissa Schactman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 9%
United States 2 6%
France 1 3%
Unknown 26 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 28%
Student > Master 7 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 19%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 28%
Psychology 9 28%
Engineering 5 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,542,740
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#493
of 1,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,183
of 49,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.