You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis by Categorizing or Dichotomizing Continuous Variables Is Inadvisable: An Example from the Natural History of Unruptured Aneurysms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a2425 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
O. Naggara, J. Raymond, F. Guilbert, D. Roy, A. Weill, D.G. Altman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 273 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 21% |
| Unknown | 50 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 38% |
| Psychology | 16 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 81 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,943,921
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#610
of 5,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,655
of 123,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.