↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of Recurrence in Patients with Stage IIIB/C Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck Following Surgery With and Without Adjuvant Radiation Therapy: Is Isolated Regional Recurrence Salvageable?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patterns of Recurrence in Patients with Stage IIIB/C Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck Following Surgery With and Without Adjuvant Radiation Therapy: Is Isolated Regional Recurrence Salvageable?
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2015
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-4356-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha Barbour, B. Mark Smithers, Chris Allan, Gerard Bayley, Janine Thomas, Matthew Foote, Bryan Burmeister, Andrew P. Barbour

Abstract

Understanding recurrence patterns is vital for guiding treatment. This study describes recurrence patterns for patients with stage IIIB/C head and neck melanoma (HNM) after therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) ± adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). We also report outcomes for salvage therapy for patients with isolated regional relapse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 71%
Psychology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,248,338
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,486
of 6,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,254
of 353,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#90
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.