↓ Skip to main content

Climate change effects on the Baltic Sea borderland between land and sea

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Climate change effects on the Baltic Sea borderland between land and sea
Published in
Ambio, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0586-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alma Strandmark, Arvid Bring, Sara A. O. Cousins, Georgia Destouni, Hans Kautsky, Gundula Kolb, Maricela de la Torre-Castro, Peter A. Hambäck

Abstract

Coastal habitats are situated on the border between land and sea, and ecosystem structure and functioning is influenced by both marine and terrestrial processes. Despite this, most scientific studies and monitoring are conducted either with a terrestrial or an aquatic focus. To address issues concerning climate change impacts in coastal areas, a cross-ecosystem approach is necessary. Since habitats along the Baltic coastlines vary in hydrology, natural geography, and ecology, climate change projections for Baltic shore ecosystems are bound to be highly speculative. Societal responses to climate change in the Baltic coastal ecosystems should have an ecosystem approach and match the biophysical realities of the Baltic Sea area. Knowledge about ecosystem processes and their responses to a changing climate should be integrated within the decision process, both locally and nationally, in order to increase the awareness of, and to prepare for climate change impacts in coastal areas of the Baltic Sea.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 28%
Environmental Science 17 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,184,476
of 24,798,538 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#928
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,545
of 362,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,798,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.