| Title |
Collaborative Care: Models for Treatment of Patients with Complex Medical-Psychiatric Conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11920-014-0506-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel O. Ivbijaro, Yaccub Enum, Anwar Ali Khan, Simon Sai-Kei Lam, Andrei Gabzdyl |
| Abstract |
Patients with co-morbidity and multi-morbidity have worse outcomes and greater healthcare needs. Co-morbid depression and other long-term conditions present health services with challenges in delivering effective care for patients. We provide some recent evidence from the literature to support the need for collaborative care, illustrated by practical examples of how to deliver a collaborative/integrated care continuum by presenting data collected between 2011 and 2012 from a London Borough clinical improvement programme that compared co-morbid diagnosis of depression and other long-term conditions and Accident and Emergency use. We have provided some practical steps for developing collaborative care within primary care and suggest that primary care family practices should adopt closer collaboration with other services in order to improve clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 31% |
| Psychology | 16 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,410,648
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#548
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,030
of 245,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#27
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.