↓ Skip to main content

Simulation study of energy resolution with changing pixel size for radon monitor based on Topmetal-II- TPC

Overview of attention for article published in Nuclear Science and Techniques, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Simulation study of energy resolution with changing pixel size for radon monitor based on Topmetal-II- TPC
Published in
Nuclear Science and Techniques, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s41365-018-0532-8
Authors

Meng-Yao Huang, Hua Pei, Xiang-Ming Sun, Shu-Guang Zou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,579,736
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Nuclear Science and Techniques
#63
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,012
of 437,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nuclear Science and Techniques
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.