↓ Skip to main content

Perturbative search for dead-end CFTs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Perturbative search for dead-end CFTs
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/jhep05(2015)046
Authors

Yu Nakayama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 10%
Italy 1 10%
Unknown 8 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 80%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,301,979
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#2,576
of 24,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,351
of 279,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#36
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.