| Title |
Probiotic capsules and xylitol chewing gum to manage symptoms of pharyngitis: a randomized controlled factorial trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.170599 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Little, Beth Stuart, Zoe Wingrove, Mark Mullee, Tammy Thomas, Sophie Johnson, Gerry Leydon, Samantha Richards-Hall, Ian Williamson, Lily Yao, Shihua Zhu, Michael Moore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 39% |
| Canada | 4 | 17% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#146,946
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#263
of 9,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,107
of 433,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#5
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.