↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the Theory of Gender and Power: HIV Risk Among Heterosexual Minority Dyads

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the Theory of Gender and Power: HIV Risk Among Heterosexual Minority Dyads
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1983-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah J. Rinehart, Alia A. Al-Tayyib, Catlainn Sionean, Nancy Rumbaugh Whitesell, Susan Dreisbach, Sheana Bull

Abstract

This study drew on the Theory of Gender and Power (TGP) as a framework to assess power inequalities within heterosexual dyads and their effects on women. Structural equation modeling was used to better understand the relationship between structural and interpersonal power and HIV sexual risk within African American and Latina women's heterosexual dyads. The main outcome variable was women's sexual HIV risk in the dyad and was created using women's reports of condomless sex with their main male partners and partners' reports of their HIV risk behaviors. Theoretical associations developed a priori yielded a well-fitting model that explained almost a quarter of the variance in women's sexual HIV risk in main partner dyads. Women's and partner structural power were indirectly associated with women's sexual HIV risk through substance use and interpersonal power. Interpersonal power was directly associated with risk. In addition, this study found that not identifying as heterosexual was directly and indirectly associated with women's heterosexual sex risk. This study provides further support for the utility of the TGP and the relevance of gender-related power dynamics for HIV prevention among heterosexually-active women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Other 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Psychology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 25 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,345,950
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,663
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,810
of 442,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#41
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.