↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacogenomic Determinants of the Cardiovascular Effects of Dalcetrapib

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 1,062)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
patent
9 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacogenomic Determinants of the Cardiovascular Effects of Dalcetrapib
Published in
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, January 2015
DOI 10.1161/circgenetics.114.000663
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Claude Tardif, Eric Rhéaume, Louis-Philippe Lemieux Perreault, Jean C Grégoire, Yassamin Feroz Zada, Géraldine Asselin, Sylvie Provost, Amina Barhdadi, David Rhainds, Philippe L L'Allier, Reda Ibrahim, Ruchi Upmanyu, Eric J Niesor, Renée Benghozi, Gabriela Suchankova, Fouzia Laghrissi-Thode, Marie-Claude Guertin, Anders G Olsson, Ian Mongrain, Gregory G Schwartz, Marie-Pierre Dubé

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Other 16 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#436,461
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#18
of 1,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,215
of 358,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.