↓ Skip to main content

Amazonian freshwater habitats experiencing environmental and socioeconomic threats affecting subsistence fisheries

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Amazonian freshwater habitats experiencing environmental and socioeconomic threats affecting subsistence fisheries
Published in
Ambio, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0610-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cleber J. R. Alho, Roberto E. Reis, Pedro P. U. Aquino

Abstract

Matching the trend seen among the major large rivers of the globe, the Amazon River and its tributaries are facing aquatic ecosystem disruption that is affecting freshwater habitats and their associated biodiversity, including trends for decline in fishery resources. The Amazon's aquatic ecosystems, linked natural resources, and human communities that depend on them are increasingly at risk from a number of identified threats, including expansion of agriculture; cattle pastures; infrastructure such as hydroelectric dams, logging, mining; and overfishing. The forest, which regulates the hydrological pulse, guaranteeing the distribution of rainfall and stabilizing seasonal flooding, has been affected by deforestation. Flooding dynamics of the Amazon Rivers are a major factor in regulating the intensity and timing of aquatic organisms. This study's objective was to identify threats to the integrity of freshwater ecosystems, and to seek instruments for conservation and sustainable use, taking principally fish diversity and fisheries as factors for analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 3%
United States 3 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 247 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Professor 16 6%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 64 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 32%
Environmental Science 56 22%
Engineering 7 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 79 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,276,913
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#898
of 1,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,549
of 352,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.