You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Has psychiatry tamed the “ketamine tiger?” Considerations on its use for depression and anxiety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.01.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keith G. Rasmussen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 18% |
| Psychology | 30 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,608,431
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry
#264
of 2,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,438
of 362,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.