↓ Skip to main content

When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary International, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 3,252)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
21 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
80 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
557 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
717 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal
Published in
Quaternary International, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045
Authors

Jan Zalasiewicz, Colin N. Waters, Mark Williams, Anthony D. Barnosky, Alejandro Cearreta, Paul Crutzen, Erle Ellis, Michael A. Ellis, Ian J. Fairchild, Jacques Grinevald, Peter K. Haff, Irka Hajdas, Reinhold Leinfelder, John McNeill, Eric O. Odada, Clément Poirier, Daniel Richter, Will Steffen, Colin Summerhayes, James P.M. Syvitski, Davor Vidas, Michael Wagreich, Scott L. Wing, Alexander P. Wolfe, Zhisheng An, Naomi Oreskes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 717 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 701 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 126 18%
Student > Bachelor 110 15%
Researcher 86 12%
Student > Master 84 12%
Professor 39 5%
Other 134 19%
Unknown 138 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 142 20%
Environmental Science 136 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 10%
Social Sciences 69 10%
Arts and Humanities 39 5%
Other 91 13%
Unknown 168 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 441. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#65,038
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary International
#5
of 3,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#727
of 287,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary International
#1
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.